May 31, 2011

$400,000 Awarded In Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Lawsuit

A Northampton woman has been awarded $400,000 in her malpractice suit against a Bethlehem doctor who did not diagnose her breast cancer properly. The jury found Dr. Mark Schadt negligent in his care of the woman.

In April 2004 she found two lumps in her breasts, and in May Dr. Schadt performed a fine-needle aspiration biopsy and the results were negative for breast cancer. In March 2005 the patient had a second fine-needle biopsy and the results were positive. A month later, after having an excisional biopsy, she was told she had invasive carcinoma stage III cancer. She had a radical mastectomy on the cancerous right breast and a simple mastectomy on her left breast.

The lawsuit alleged Dr. Shadt should have followed the first biopsy with a more complete biopsy that would have removed a larger tissue sample to test.

The Columbia SC Medical Malpractice Lawyers at Louthian Law Firm have many years of experience in medical malpractice cases and we are committed to providing personal service and to obtaining fair compensation for all our clients. Call us at 1-866-454-1200 or fill out our confidential online case evaluation form.

Medical Malpractice

May 26, 2011

Truck Driver Sued In Fatal Crash

The Gering, Nebraska family of a man who was killed when his car collided with a semi in December 2009 has filed a wrongful death lawsuit for an unspecified amount against the truck driver in federal court, reports the Fremont Tribune.

The lawsuit alleges the driver of the semi, Jwanna Gilzeane of Georgia, was driving recklessly and carelessly when Kenneth Vanderveen’s car collided with the truck on Interstate 80 near Grand Island. The suit also names several trucking companies linked to Mr. Gilzeane.

If you have been injured in or a loved one has been killed in an automobile accident, it’s important to make sure you understand your legal rights. Contact the experienced car accident attorneys at the Louthian Law Firm for a free evaluation of your case at 1-866-454-1200 or fill out our confidential online consultation form.

Wrongful Death

May 24, 2011

Woman Who Lost Arm To Receive $8.8 Million

In 2004, a 16-year-old girl got the pocket of her coat caught on a bolt protruding from the drive shaft of an auger-like post-hole digger operated by her stepfather. Her arm wrapped around the auger resulting in the loss of her arm.

A New York jury hearing the case in State Supreme Court decided the manufacturer of the digger, Ford New Holland (now known as Case New Holland) sold a defective product and awarded the now 21-year-old girl $8.8 million. The jury placed 35% of the blame on Case New Holland and 30% each on Peter A Smith, the owner of the digger and the person who loaned the digger to the stepfather, and on SMC Corp. from Sioux Fall, S.D., the company who assembled the digger.

The bolt that caught on the girl’s coat was supposed to be covered by a shield, but the shield broke and was removed by Smith, the owner of the digger, in 1999. The lawsuit alleges the shield was always inadequate and there is nothing to support the fact it was ever tested.

When we buy something, we assume that it wouldn’t be offered for sale if it weren’t safe to use. Unfortunately, that’s not always the case. Every year, thousands of Americans are injured by unsafe consumer products.

If you or someone you care about was hurt or killed by a defective product, contact the Louthian Law Firm today toll free at (866) 454-1200 or locally at (803) 454-1200, or online for a free evaluation of your case.

Defective Product

May 19, 2011

Indiana City To Make Settlement In Death Of Child

On Thanksgiving Day in 2008, a 5-year-old boy crawled into a transformer box and was electrocuted. WSBT reports the city of Mishawaka has reached a settlement with the boy’s family for an undisclosed amount. According to state law, there is a $700,000 cap on lawsuits with municipalities.

Mishawaka Utilities owned the box which had been left open that day at the Carriage House apartment complex.

The family also sued the Carriage House Apartments and Gene Glick, manager, for wrongful death and negligent infliction of emotional distress. This lawsuit has not been settled.

A “wrongful death” is a death caused by the carelessness (negligence) or misconduct of another person or organization. The Louthian Law Firm has vast experience in pursuing wrongful death lawsuits. Call us today at 1-800-454-1200 for a free evaluation of your unique case.

Wrongful Death

May 17, 2011

Iowa Couple Sues Ex-Landlord Over Granddaughter’s Death

A couple who fled Africa to save their granddaughter’s life has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against their ex-landlord for her death and for their own injuries in a 2009 house fire, reports the Chicago Tribune.

Their apartment caught fire as the result of the man next door falling asleep with a lit cigarette. The grandparents were unable to open the second-floor windows to escape and lost consciousness along with their granddaughter and were pulled from the building by firefighters. The 10-year-old died the following day from smoke inhalation and the adults were in comas for several months with severe burns and have been left disabled.

The lawsuit alleges the former landlord did not warn them of either the neighbor’s history of starting fires and of his mental disorder or that the upstairs windows could not be opened.

A “wrongful death” is a death caused by the carelessness (negligence) or misconduct of another person or organization. The Louthian Law Firm has vast experience in pursuing wrongful death lawsuits. Call us today at 1-800-410-5656 for a free evaluation of your unique case.

Wrongful Death

May 12, 2011

South Carolina Whistleblower Law Reforms Long Overdue

The existing South Carolina whistleblower law is an attempt to encourage state and local government employees to report instances of wrongdoing by other government employees. Such wrongdoing could include bribery, kickbacks, embezzlement, conflicts of interest and misuse of government assets for personal gain. Unfortunately, the S.C. law acts as a disincentive for potential whistleblowers.

Typical witnesses to public corruption are employees who can face retaliation from the very people who are committing the criminal acts. Whistleblower protection legislation should protect and compensate those reporting alleged wrongdoing, but South Carolina law sets arbitrary, low limits on restitution, thereby discouraging the whistleblowers from stepping forward.

South Carolina attorney Herbert W. Louthian co-authored an article on the S.C. whistleblower law and its need for reform. Louthian's article, SC’s Whistleblower Law Reforms Long Overdue, states, “The current law (Section 8-27-10 et seq.) limits the damages for a government employee who has suffered retaliatory discharge or demotion to $15,000. That means if the employee was earning $50,000 per year, was fired in retaliation and remained jobless for two years, he would suffer a net loss of $85,000 plus lost benefits.”

He further points out that the current law stipulates attorneys may be paid only $10,000 in fees for a tried case. If the case continues through the appeals process, the attorney can then get only another $15,000 potential fee even if the case drags on for as long as two more years.

This scenario demonstrates that the potential for whistleblowers recovering lost wages or being rewarded for protecting the government from corrupt activities is virtually nonexistent. In fact, Louthian opines, “… no sane employee would risk losing his job and livelihood to blow the whistle on public corruption, and no attorney would take the case.”

South Carolina legislators have the responsibility to reform this law to motivate and fairly compensate the victims and any attorneys that pursue whistle blowing. Attorney Louthian recommends a three-pronged approach to a new law. First, the recovery of damages and lost wages should be fair and in line with actual losses an employee would experience. Attorneys, too, should recover fees in line with the case complexity, time spent, and the results achieved. Last, the whistleblower should receive compensation for the recovery of misused or stolen public funds of at least 10 percent.

South Carolina's governor and our legislators have taken the first steps in helping to curb public corruption in our state with long-overdue reforms. Governor Nikki Haley has created an Office of Inspector General to help identify cases of public corruption in her Cabinet agencies. Furthermore, SC senators Jake Knotts and Vincent Sheheen introduced a bill in early May to institute the reforms suggested.

The article co-authored by Louthian closes by saying, “These reforms would be much more effective if public employees were incentivized by a new sharp-edge whistleblower law to report the illegal activities that only they know about. Together, they can save the taxpayers enormous sums of money in the near future.”

The South Carolina attorneys at Louthian Law Firm are here for you if you want to pursue a claim under the whistleblower act or any other employment law.

Contact Our SC Personal Injury Lawyers Today

If you or someone you care about suffered a personal or other injury caused by someone else, or have been harmed by a workplace practice, contact the South Carolina attorneys at Louthian Law Firm today at 866-454-1200, or locally at 803-454-1200, or online for a free evaluation of your case.

May 12, 2011

$5 Million Sought In Botched Colonoscopy

A Winchester, Va. Woman has filed a medical malpractice lawsuit over a colonoscopy she had in 2009 which has continued to cause her medical problems, reports the Northern Virginia Daily.

The then 29-year-old woman went to the doctor in 2009 to evaluate persistent diarrhea. Following the “prep” for the procedure, she had severe abdominal pain, cramping, nausea and vomiting. After prescribing something for the pain, the doctor proceeded with the procedure without knowing what was causing her pain. That same day she had to be admitted to intensive care, two days later underwent a second colonoscopy during which her colon was perforated, and had to have emergency surgery to repair the perforation and to remove the obstructed part of the colon.

The patient is seeking $5 million in damages from Dr. Richard John Sears and Winchester Gastroenterology Associates PLC claiming Dr. Sears breached his duty of care by proceeding with the first colonoscopy and then performed a second colonoscopy when a CT scan would have revealed a significant “stricture” that required surgery.

The suit also claims Sears performed both procedures without the patient’s consent and did not describe the risks or alternatives, caused the second perforation to the colon that developed into sepsis and failed to keep her from aspirating brown fecal-like material among other medical problems.

The Columbia SC Medical Malpractice Lawyers at Louthian Law Firm have many years of experience in medical malpractice cases and we are committed to providing personal service and to obtaining fair compensation for all our clients. Call us at 1-866-454-1200 or fill out our confidential online case evaluation form.

Medical Malpractice

May 10, 2011

Woman Awarded $21 Million for Injuries at Wal-Mart Distribution Center

A Pike County (Alabama) jury has awarded an employee of Wal-Mart distribution center $21 million for injuries she suffered while working in the banana ripening room, reports the Dothan News.

In April 2008, the then 26-year-old woman was standing in the doorway of one of the newly constructed banana ripening rooms when a 3-4 foot tall metal plate covering the trim at the top of one of the room’s doors fell 30 feet and struck her in the face. She not only suffered face lacerations, but it severed her nerves and muscles in her face.

Several days later, she developed seizures which now occur on a regular basis and puts her at risk of a condition called sudden epileptic death. Due to the seizures, she’s not able to be alone and to completely care for her 2-year-old daughter.

The lawsuit was filed against Thermal Technologies and its contractor, Helsel Contracting, which built the banana rooms along with the doors. It was alleged the metal fell from the door because it wasn’t properly secured with bolts. Wal-Mart was not listed as one of the defendants in the verdict.

Personal injury deals with injuries caused by the negligence of others. If you or a loved one has been injured due to the negligence of another, the attorneys at Louthian Law Firm can help. Call us for a free consultation at 1-866-454-1200.

Personal Injury

May 5, 2011

Caterpillar Reportedly Paid $9 Million to Paralyzed Worker

Bloomberg reports Caterpillar has paid more than $9 million in one of last year’s largest product liability verdicts.

The 41-year-old worker was using a Caterpillar Wheel Tractor 623 G Scraper in August 2006 when the machine “suddenly and without warning began dramatically bouncing up and down.” The bucking caused the man’s seat to fail and slammed him against the machine’s frame causing spinal injuries and a punctured lung. He is now paralyzed from the waist down.

The lawsuit claims Caterpillar was aware of the tractors’ defects that made them move erratically, but did nothing to fix them. The jury found both Caterpillar and Holt Texas Ltd., the dealership that sold the scraper to the man’s employer, liable for actual and punitive damages.

Manufacturers have a legal duty not to offer us unsafe products without warning. When they fail in that duty and someone is seriously injured or killed, we have the right to hold them legally and financially responsible for those injuries. If you or someone you care about was hurt or killed by a defective product, contact the South Carolina attorneys at Louthian Law Firm today at 866-454-1200, or locally at 803-454-1200, or online for a free evaluation of your case.

Product Liability

May 3, 2011

Wrongful Death Suit Filed Against Mitsubishi After SUV Rollover Accident

The parents of a 17-year-old boy who was killed in 2009 when the 2000 Mitsubishi Montero in which he was riding rolled over has filed a wrongful death suit against the automaker, reports The Salem News.

The Ipswich, MA teen and a 16-year-old girl were thrown from the back seat when the young driver who was unfamiliar with the road, lost control and rolled over on a curve just north of Route 60 in Revere. Both were killed.

The lawsuit claims the “unreasonably dangerous” design of the Montero is to blame and that Mitsubishi Motors North America is liable. This lawsuit adds to the already numerous ones around the country filed against Mitsubishi which alleges the SUV is top heavy – thus making it more likely to roll – and the manufacturer should have put an electronic stability control on all of its models. Claims of seat belts coming undone under stress and that the roof and pillars were more likely to collapse on Mitsubishi that on other vehicles have also been noted.

The lawsuit also claims the company has known about the problems from independent testing agencies and has had multiple lawsuits, yet has done nothing to correct the design flaws.

The parents have asked to settle the case for $7 million, but Mitsubishi refused and demanded a crash report so they could analyze the information in order to decide whether to “compromise on what they view as a doubtful and disputed claim.”

If you have been injured or a loved one has been killed in an automobile accident, it’s important to make sure you understand your legal rights. Contact the experienced car accident attorneys at the Louthian Law Firm for a free evaluation of your case at 1-866-454-1200 or fill out our confidential online consultation form.

Wrongful Death